This is not an accident. It is a structural effect: symbolic architectures naturalise themselves.
-
invisible as a choice,
-
unquestioned as a convention,
-
and indistinguishable from ‘the way things are.’
The result is a powerful epistemological illusion: a symbolic order masquerading as ontology. Not just “this is how we say it,” but “this is what it is.”
This illusion is structurally stabilising. It renders symbolic governance imperceptible. If the way a system cuts the world is no longer recognised as a cut, it cannot be resisted, reconfigured, or re-aligned. It becomes an unmarked infrastructure of the real.
-
Genre: recurrent symbolic patterns embedded in social activity.
-
Entrainment: repeated coordination of actions and meanings over time.
-
Phasing: the alignment of symbolic acts into patterned sequences that conceal their contingency.
Over time, the symbolic forms involved in these processes become habitual. Their origin in choice, contestation, and construal fades from view.
-
exposing symbolic architectures as choices,
-
reactivating agency within the system,
-
and opening paths to reconfiguration.
In this way, reflexive construal is a political act. It restores the possibility of re-aligning symbolic systems with new forms of life.
In the next post, we’ll explore one of the paradoxes at the heart of symbolic architecture: how the most powerful symbolic systems are those that present themselves as pre-symbolic—as neutral, universal, or ‘merely descriptive.’
No comments:
Post a Comment