From Collective Construal to Symbolic Cosmos: 32 When the Scaffolds Crack—Symbolic Disalignment and Ontological Rupture

Symbolic architecture offers coherence, but it is not immune to collapse. When its scaffolds no longer align with lived construal, we encounter not mere instability—but ontological rupture.

1. Disalignment as Crisis

Disalignment is not error. It is the rupture of reflexive congruence:

• When collective construal no longer phases with the symbolic forms meant to orient it.

• When shared symbols become inert, ironic, or weaponised.

• When foundational narratives splinter into incompatible truths.

This is not a failure of communication—it is a collapse in the conditions of possibility for collective worlding.

2. Crisis as Ontological Event

An ontological rupture does not erase the world—it reconstrues it through fracture:

• The sacred becomes absurd.

• The lawful becomes arbitrary.

• The cosmic becomes chaotic.

• The self becomes unmoored.

This is not mere cultural breakdown. It is the unmaking of coherence at the symbolic level—a confrontation with the void within our most durable forms of sense.

3. The Reflexive Fold of Collapse

Collapse, too, is reflexive. It folds back on the symbolic system:

• It exposes the system as a system—contingent, constructed, vulnerable.

• It reopens the space of construal—raw, destabilised, generative.

• It signals the edge of one cosmos and the latent formation of another.

Every ontological rupture carries within it the seeds of symbolic reformation—but the passage is perilous.

---

What cracks is not merely belief, but the architecture of symbolic orientation itself. When the scaffolds collapse, the cosmos is not gone—it is exposed as constructed, reflexive, and always at risk.

In the next post, we consider what it means to dwell in the aftermath—when no symbolic structure holds, and new alignment is not yet found.