What scaffolds meaning when meaning becomes world?
1. Symbolic Structure as Scaffold of Reality
A symbolic architecture is not a metaphoric structure. It is the organising potential of construal when recursively actualised. It stabilises what would otherwise remain in flux:
-
Temporality becomes narrative.
-
Relation becomes ritual.
-
Pattern becomes law.
-
Possibility becomes ontology.
These are not imposed schemas—they are the internal logics of construal, made durable through symbolic alignment across time, space, and collective bodies.
2. Constraining the Infinite
Symbolic architecture does not capture totality. It does the opposite: it curates finitude within the infinite.
This is not limitation but affordance. Just as grammar constrains language into speakable meaning, symbolic architecture constrains becoming into cosmic coherence.
These constraints:
-
Enable shared orientation (e.g., cosmologies, origin stories).
-
Provide phasal thresholds (e.g., rites, reforms, revolutions).
-
Produce recursive depth (e.g., tradition, scripture, jurisprudence).
3. Stratified Reflexivity
Symbolic architecture is layered:
-
Primary stratum: The construal of phenomena—what is.
-
Secondary stratum: The construal of construal—what it means to mean.
-
Tertiary stratum: The symbolic reflexivity of symbolic systems—how symbols become reality itself.
These layers are not neatly stacked. They phase, overlap, and feed back recursively, co-structuring the very space in which construal unfolds.
A symbolic cosmos is not a decorative overlay. It is a relational architecture of meaning, continuously recursive, reflexively phased, and always oriented toward new thresholds.
In the next post, we consider the limits of symbolic architecture—and what happens when its scaffolds no longer hold.
No comments:
Post a Comment