This is not a void. It is a field of suspended construal, where meaning no longer aligns reflexively and yet remains intensely active.
1. The Ontological Interval
In the aftermath of rupture, we dwell in a symbolic lacuna:
-
Not a return to silence, but cacophony—multiple partial construals, none hegemonic.
-
Not a blank slate, but a shimmering multiplicity of broken forms, repurposed signs, and tentative improvisations.
-
Not certainty lost, but reflexivity unanchored—the space in which new alignment is possible, but not yet actualised.
This is the middle voice of cosmogenesis—neither purely agentive nor purely receptive.
2. Living Reflexively Without Foundation
To dwell here is not to flounder, but to inhabit reflexive uncertainty:
-
We learn to construe without guarantee.
-
We align provisionally, knowingly.
-
We remain alert to phasing without rushing toward final form.
Such dwelling cultivates symbolic humility—a radical openness to the conditions of worldmaking.
3. The Generative Potency of Disorientation
Disorientation, sustained without denial, becomes a site of generative construal:
-
New orientations are not adopted, but slowly condensed.
-
Shared alignment emerges not from authority, but from iterated resonance.
-
Cosmos is reborn not as imposed order, but as converging construals made viable by mutual reflexivity.
The interval is thus not a delay, but a depth—a phase space in which symbolic futures germinate.
To dwell in the interval is to live within a cosmic ellipsis—the space between one symbolic order and the next. It is a place of vigilance, attunement, and careful hope.
In the next post, we ask: how do new symbolic architectures take hold? What enables certain forms to consolidate, to endure, and to become cosmically generative?
No comments:
Post a Comment