If myth stages the cosmos through story and philosophy through concept, science stages it through method. Science is not merely the accumulation of facts but the construction of symbolic architectures that stabilise construal through experiment, measurement, and model. It reconfigures possibility by introducing systematic procedures for testing and coordinating symbolic cuts.
The Birth of Scientific Architecture
The rise of modern science in the 16th and 17th centuries is often narrated as a revolution: the overthrow of myth and metaphysics by observation and reason. But like philosophy’s logos-mythos story, this is itself a myth—science’s founding myth. From a relational perspective, science does not abolish myth and philosophy; it reorganises symbolic possibility into a new architecture.
Where myth grounded cosmos in divine drama and philosophy in conceptual principle, science grounds it in methodical procedure: observation, hypothesis, experiment, law. Science stages order not as divine will or eternal principle, but as reproducible pattern within controlled construal.
Science as Procedural Scaffolding
What distinguishes scientific architecture is not its access to a hidden reality, but its invention of procedural scaffolds for construal. It does not simply describe nature but creates conditions under which events can be construed as data, patterns, and laws.
The telescope, the laboratory, the calculus—all these are not neutral instruments but symbolic infrastructures. They reconfigure possibility by making certain phenomena visible, measurable, and predictable. The cosmos is cut into data points and regularities that can be coordinated across communities.
The Symbolic Force of Method
Scientific method functions as a ritual of modernity: repeatable, transferable, and collectively binding. To call something “scientific” is to align it with a shared architecture of trust. The symbolic power of science lies less in the content of any one theory and more in the method itself as a symbolic scaffold for knowledge.
This procedural emphasis also transforms authority. Where myth grounded authority in gods and philosophy in principles, science grounds it in reproducibility. Knowledge is not sacred revelation nor rational deduction but collective alignment around procedures that can be repeated and confirmed.
Science as Narrative of Progress
Yet science is also mythic in its own right. It tells stories of progress, enlightenment, and conquest over ignorance. It stages humanity as discoverer of nature’s secrets, as if peeling back a veil to reveal reality itself. These narratives sustain science’s symbolic authority, even while its actual scaffolding is procedural and constructed.
Closure: Science as Third Cut
Science is not the end of philosophy or myth, but the third cut in symbolic architecture. It reconfigures possibility by shifting from divine drama to conceptual principle to procedural method. It scaffolds construal through instruments, models, and collective reproducibility.
If myth was the first cut and philosophy the second, science is the third: the cosmos reflexively aligning itself through systematic method. Not truth revealed, nor essence deduced, but possibility organised through procedure.
Science, then, is not just a practice of knowing. It is a symbolic architecture of coordination, a stage upon which the cosmos construes itself through us by method.
No comments:
Post a Comment