Introduction: The Aftermath of Reflexive Failure
When symbolic systems collapse, what remains is not a clean slate, but a fractured field of semiotic residue: broken alignments, wounded myths, flickering rituals. The question is not how to return to coherence, but how a collective might begin again—how meaning can re-emerge when the symbolic order has turned in on itself.
1. Ruins as Relational Traces
Post-collapse, the symbolic field is marked by:
-
Fractured semiotic residues—myths, icons, or narratives that no longer phase
-
Incoherent genres—fragments of past construals surviving without a systemic logic
-
Intensified individuation—individuals carrying more of the burden of sense-making
These ruins are not empty. They retain traces of former alignment—echoes of potential.
2. Re-alignment as Emergence, Not Restoration
A post-collapse realignment cannot be engineered from above. It emerges when:
-
Local construals resonate across scales
-
Affiliations form around shared phasing, not shared content
-
Symbolic innovations condense the relational potential of the field
The collective re-phases when meaning begins to scale again—not as repetition, but as novel coherence.
3. Mythogenesis After Collapse
The seeds of new symbolic life are often mythic—but in a different key:
-
Not the hero’s journey, but the weaver’s return: a dispersed process of stitching fragments into new fabrics
-
Not salvation myths, but reciprocal recognition: narratives that allow selves to see themselves in relation
-
Not foundational truths, but relational becomings: stories that unfold through phasing, not fixed meaning
These myths do not replace the broken ones. They grow through the fractures.
4. Meta-symbolic Genres as Carriers of Renewal
Certain genres hold the potential to initiate re-alignment:
-
Dialogic rituals—not performance, but situated acts of shared construal
-
Grief-work—not closure, but bearing witness to the failure of meaning
-
Speculative imaginaries—not utopias, but phase-possibility spaces
These genres don’t offer answers. They provide fields of symbolic incubation.
5. Re-alignment as Ethical Practice
Realignment is not merely aesthetic or epistemic. It is an ethical act:
-
To align is to commit to mutual construal
-
To phase is to risk being reshaped by relation
-
To symbolise is to hold the world as reflexive—even when it has forgotten itself
The new symbolic order, if it comes, will not emerge from above. It will be woven in the ruins, by those still willing to mean.
Conclusion: Phasing Forward
We do not return from collapse. We rephase—slowly, contingently, relationally.
In the next post, we will explore how symbolic infrastructures can be cultivated to support this re-alignment: not as totalising systems, but as open architectures for collective construal.
No comments:
Post a Comment